|
* Release of RFP document |
**DATE** |
|
* Last day to submit questions prior to pre-proposal vendor meeting |
**DATE** |
|
* Pre-proposal vendor meeting |
**DATE, TIME** |
|
|
**ADDRESS** |
|
* Last day to submit "Notification of Intent to Bid Form" |
**DATE** |
|
* Submission of proposals |
**DATE, TIME** |
|
* Opening of responses to RFP |
**DATE, TIME** |
|
* Response evaluation period |
**DATE** |
|
* Recommendation to the Board to award a contract |
**DATE** |
|
* Proposed contract start date |
**DATE** |
2.10 RIGHTS TO PROPOSAL DOCUMENT
All copies and contents thereof of any proposal, attachment, and explanation thereto submitted in response to this Request For Proposal, except copyrighted material, shall become the property of REQUESTING-ENTITY. All copyrighted material must be clearly marked.
2.11 ORAL PRESENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION
Vendors may be required to make an oral presentation to REQUESTING-ENTITY's evaluation team during the RFP evaluation period. The REQUESTING-ENTITY and vendor will schedule these presentations at a mutually agreed upon time and location. Vendors will be informed about details of the presentation and given sufficient time to prepare for such a presentation.
2.12 AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract for the core system will be made to one vendor whose proposal provides the most favorable solution to REQUESTING-ENTITY.
It is anticipated that the contract, if awarded, will be awarded within 60 days of the closing date for receipt of vendor proposals. Vendors must state that the proposal is valid for 60 days from the submission date shown in
Section 2.9.
REQUESTING-ENTITY reserves the right to reject all proposals and not issue any contract based on this RFP.
2.13 PROJECTED SOFTWARE OPERATIONAL DATE
In order to meet REQUESTING-ENTITY's need for a timely implementation of the new automated case management system, it is anticipated that the core software system will be brought into operation by **DATE**.
| Section | Title |
| Transmittal Letter | |
| Executive Summary | |
| 1.0 | Responses to RFP Sections 4.0 and 5.0 |
| 2.0 | Company Background |
| 3.0 | Proposed Application Software and Computing Environment |
| 4.0 | Database Software |
| 5.0 | Ad hoc Reporting |
| 6.0 | System Security |
| 7.0 |
Implementation Support and Training |
| 8.0 |
Maintenance Program |
| 9.0 |
Client References |
| 10.0 |
Cost Quotations |
| 11.0 |
Contract Terms and Conditions |
| 12.0 |
Financial Information |
| 13.0 |
Resumes |
| 14.0 |
Attachments Checklist and Miscellaneous Information |
3.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This part of the response to the RFP should be limited to a brief narrative highlighting the vendor's proposal. The summary should contain as little technical jargon as possible, and should be oriented toward non-technical personnel. The Executive Summary should not include cost quotations.
3.2 RESPONSES TO RFP Sections 4.0 and 5.0 (Section 1.0)
The vendor must provide narrative responses to each of the requirements listed in Section 4.0 of the RFP.
Responses to the requirements listed in Section 5.0 of this RFP must also be provided in this Section of the vendor's response. Vendors should use the format provided and add explanation details as necessary. The following answer key should be used when responding to the requirements:
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
How long has company been in business? |
  |
How long has company been in business providing the proposed application software? |
  |
Provide total revenue for 1999. (Include audited financial statement in Section 12.0) |
  |
Provide total revenue for 2000. (Include audited financial statement in Section 12.0) |
  |
Provide total revenue for 2001. (Include audited financial statement in Section 12.0) |
  |
Provide a copy of your company's Dun & Bradstreet report for 2001. (Include in Section 12.0.) |
  |
State number of employees in company. |
  |
State total number of employees dedicated to Client Services. (i.e., training, implementation, etc.). |
  |
State total number of employees dedicated to Sales and Sales Support. |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing RDBMS based Applications. |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing Image Enabled Applications. |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing Kiosk Enabled Applications. |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing Barcode Enabled Applications. |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing Voice Response Applications |
  |
State number of years the company has been providing Client/Server Applications |
  |
Ability to provide source code with the software license, without additional charge. |
  |
Provide number of employees dedicated to Help Desk Support. |
  |
What are the hours of operation for the Help Desk? |
  |
Ability to provide toll-free telephone support for this product. |
  |
Does the vendor maintain a hardware warranty service location in the state. |
  |
Is database and development tools support provided by the application vendor? |
  |
Does the vendor have an on-line system in place to track new and incoming calls from customers, as well as keep history on all support calls? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism in place to track response times of incoming calls from customers, by individual consultant and by product? |
  |
Does the vendor have the ability to report statistics on response time? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism in place to track resolution times of incoming calls from customers, by individual consultant and by product? |
  |
Does the vendor have ability to report statistics on resolution time? |
  |
Can the vendor provide statistics showing year-to-date response and resolution times on support calls by individual consultant and by product? If so, please provide in Section 14.0. |
  |
Does the vendor track fiscal year-to-date statistics of individual consultants' response and resolution times of incoming calls? If so, please provide in Section 14.0. |
  |
What is the average response time for support calls to the help desk? |
  |
Provide percentage of support calls that the help desk consultant responds to in less than 1 hour? |
  |
Does the vendor have a priority-based procedure in place to resolve a "system down/production critical" call from a customer? |
  |
Does the vendor survey the customer support calls to receive feedback on the help desk? If so, state type of information provided with survey. |
  |
Does the vendor measure the results of the call surveys? If so, provide these results in Section 14.0. |
  |
Does the vendor send to customers an annual Customer Satisfaction Survey that solicits feedback concerning your help desk, training, maintenance services as well as an overall evaluation of services and products provided to customers? If so, include a copy of this Survey with the Survey Results in Section 14.0. |
  |
Does the vendor have a procedure in place to accept and respond to help desk requests via e-mail? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism in place to determine varying degrees of urgency for callback to the customer? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism in place to track total number of calls received by product? |
  |
Does the vendor have the ability to retrieve and review on-line a customer's call history? |
  |
Are all calls tracked on-line, with date and time stamp? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism in place for customers to subscribe to specific product listservers in order to communicate with and get feedback from other customers about their use of the products? |
  |
Does the vendor have a mechanism for generating statistical reports for the customer support organization. If so, include a copy of this report in Section 14.0. |
  |
Are updated versions of the proposed database development tool provided? |
  |
Is there an automated mechanism to submit enhancement recommendations throughout the year? |
  |
Is a help desk tracking number provided to the customer for future call tracking purposes? |
  |
Are Remote diagnostic services available from the help desk? |
  |
Is the help desk staff dedicated to the proposed application software? |
  |
Are updates and defect corrections available electronically to be downloaded by the customer? |
  |
Are extended support agreements offered for five years or more? |
  |
Costs for application source code and object code have been included in Section 10.0. |
  |
Does the vendor assign an Account Manager? If so, provide a list of Account Manager's responsibilities in Section 7.0. |
  |
|
User Group Requirements |
|
Does vendor host annual User Group meetings/conferences? If so, where was the last one held? |
  |
Does vendor have Client Advisory Groups for product input? |
  |
|
Research and Development Requirements |
|
State total number of employees dedicated to Research and Development. |
  |
Does vendor have a continuing Research and Development program? |
  |
Does vendor allocate employees strictly for research and development? If so, how many? |
  |
State the approximate dollar amount of research and development investment made in 2001? |
  |
What percentage of annual revenue is typically allocated towards Research and Development? |
  |
|
Marketing Requirements |
|
Does vendor have the ability to provide product calendar outlining future upgrades and enhancements? |
  |
Does vendor allocate a Product Manager for each product? If so, please include Product Manager resume in Section 13.0. |
  |
Does vendor provide multiple methodologies for clients to recommend product enhancements? |
  |
Does vendor provide clients with method of direct contact at executive level? |
  |
Does vendor provide client communication services in the form of a listserver? |
  |
Does vendor devote staff to conduct on-going market research to gain knowledge of market and product trends? |
  |
Does vendor belong to national associations and organizations related to services provided with the proposed software application(s)? |
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
All dates are entered and stored in a four-digit year format. |
  |
All dates are displayed in a four-digit year format. |
  |
Application is fully Year 2000 compliant. |
  |
Does the application handle leap years? |
  |
Does the application handle leap year in the Year 2000? |
  |
Can the end-user enter only the last two digits of the year and have the application automatically convert it to four? |
  |
Ability to access all data elements within the application database. |
  |
All data elements within the application database operate from a single data element dictionary. |
  |
Provides database repository (metadata, extended data attributes, object storage, team development, etc.). |
  |
Database elements are currently externally defined so that any ODBC compliant tool may be used to access them. |
  |
Ability to run on a relational database management system in an open system environment. |
  |
Ability to backup RDBMS while on-line and batch processing is occurring. |
  |
Ability to optimize RDBMS performance without shutting down the database or application. |
  |
Ability to lock, read, and write data on multiple servers. |
  |
Data can span multiple physical volumes. |
  |
Supports automatic query optimization. |
  |
Ability to support two-phase commits. |
  |
Application currently utilizes standard SQL calls to the database. |
  |
Application currently utilizes standard PL*SQL calls to the database. |
  |
Application currently supports ANSI SQL92 standards. |
  |
Ability to have the SQL reside and be executed on the database server, not the desktop. |
  |
The SQL packages are pre-compiled and ready to execute without the need to be re-parsed (interpreted). |
  |
SQL package routines have been built so that the long SQL statements are not sent across the network from the desktop. |
  |
Supports database triggers:
|
  |
The application uses Client/Server architecture. |
  |
The application provides two-tier client/server architecture characteristics. |
  |
The application provides three-tier client/server architecture characteristics. |
  |
Desktop (Client) has been deployed by a customer under Windows 95. |
  |
Please provide the name of the client. |
  |
Desktop (Client) has been deployed by a customer under Windows 98. |
  |
Please provide the name of the client. |
  |
Desktop (Client) has been deployed by a customer under Windows 2000. |
  |
Please provide the name of the client. |
  |
Desktop (Client) has been deployed by a customer under Windows NT. |
  |
Please provide the name of the client. |
  |
Windows NT, Windows 2000, and UNIX are supported for the Server. |
  |
Please specify the UNIX supported, e.g. AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, SCO, Linux. |
  |
Ability to define the application screen colors under Microsoft Windows. |
  |
Ability to navigate through system using only a mouse. |
  |
Ability to navigate through system using only a keyboard. |
  |
Ability to customize the function keys. |
  |
Ability to navigate directly to any screen or menu in the system by a single command from anywhere in the system. |
  |
Comprehensive edit controls at the field level so that incomplete or invalid data will be verified before allowing the user to continue on to the next field. |
  |
Currently runs in GUI based environment. |
  |
Application does not require additional software such as a terminal emulator to operate in a GUI environment. |
  |
Ability to run as a "thin client" under a browser such as Netscape. |
  |
Software makes use of pop-up windows, drop down menus, radio buttons, and buttons to display list of values when entry is validated against a table. |
  |
Ability to customize portions of the application through use of site defined fields. |
  |
Ability to create user defined menu's for each specific user or group of users. |
  |
Ability to link multiple screens together to form a user defined workflow process without programmer intervention. |
  |
Provides on-line messaging capability within the application to allow users to communicate electronically. |
  |
Provides on-line notification to the user when a message has been received within the application. |
  |
Ability for on-line real-time update of data elements within the application database. |
  |
Ability for real time updates such that on-line access from anywhere within the network displays the most current element value. |
  |
Ability for user definition and maintenance of system values and rules without requiring programmer intervention or recompilation of programs. |
  |
User documentation includes copies of all standard reports. |
  |
User documentation includes illustrations of all application screens. |
  |
User documentation includes all data entry requirements for each screen. |
  |
User documentation is available on-line and CD-ROM. |
  |
Technical documentation includes the data element dictionary. |
  |
Technical documentation includes a program narrative for each function and element. |
  |
Technical documentation includes record and file specifications. |
  |
Technical documentation includes all process operating instructions. |
  |
Technical documentation includes naming conventions and programming standards. |
  |
Technical documentation is available on-line and CD-ROM. |
  |
System provides help at the screen level without leaving the application, and automatically positions you in the help text for the current section of the screen the user is on. |
  |
System provides help at the field level without leaving the application, and automatically positions you in the help text for the current field the user is on. |
  |
System provides user defined local help at the screen level without leaving the application, and automatically positions you in the help text for the current screen the user is on. |
  |
System displays cursor sensitive hint text that automatically changes as the user moves from field to field. |
  |
Ability to customize existing application help text. |
  |
Ability to maintain a court defined procedures manual on-line by adding local help text for screen, section and field level, and maintaining that version of help in addition to the existing application help. |
  |
Currently able for the software to use any independent query/report tool which will provide inquiry and report generation capabilities such as Microsoft Access, Focus, IQ, etc. |
  |
Provides a security component which controls access to the database information from 3rd party tools based on the organization and individual permissions. |
  |
Provision for user defined security for all options, tables and views. |
  |
Ability to provide for full back-up and recovery in the case of any type of malfunction (hardware and/or software). |
  |
Ability to produce both standard and ad hoc reports, as well as allow for the use of standard query tools and statistical packages. |
  |
Ability to specify specific case and departmental elements as sort criteria in standard reports. |
  |
Ability to provide report restarts, sequence selection and printer configuration override. |
  |
Ability to view on-line all information stored in the system. |
  |
Provision for multiple databases to allow for testing, training, etc., that co-reside and may be accessed simultaneously with productive use of production database. |
  |
Provide source code in escrow. |
  |
Provide source code and all development tools used to build the application on our computer. |
  |
Provide source code library management methodology. |
  |
Provide source code and development tools used for subsequent application software updates and enhancements. |
  |
Ability for the customer to be able to produce entity diagrams. |
  |
Allow the court to modify the applications themselves. |
  |
Provision for version change control to maintain/update modification information for support purposes. |
  |
Provide conversion programs and tools with established standards and procedures for data conversion purposes. |
  |
Are direct calls to the RDBMS API supported. |
  |
Ability of the database design to allow you to perform reorganization activities on an individual table level, individual index level, individual schema level, all the way up to complete database level. |
  |
Ability to allow individual tables and indexes to be reorganized without having to take the entire database down. |
  |
Ability of the application and RDBMS to support single-database - single-instance Architecture. |
  |
Ability of the application and RDBMS to support single-database - multi-instance Parallel Server Architecture. |
  |
Ability of the application and RDBMS to support multi-database - multi-instance Distributed Server Architecture. |
  |
Ability to have the data element dictionary dynamically maintained without human intervention being required with all changes to the database structure going into effect immediately. |
  |
The database never has to be shut down or reorganized for data dictionary changes to take effect. |
  |
Ability to add new fields to the database without requiring reorganization of the database. |
  |
Are tools provided that can be used to produce a cross-reference report of where a specific database field is referenced by the application software. |
  |
Ability to link or embed OLE objects into the application. |
  |
Ability to execute DDE links to any other DDE-compliant product from the application. |
  |
Does the application support peer-to-peer architecture for complete data transparency to the users and application programmers? |
  |
Tools included to upload data from flat files into the application database with automatic logging/edit capability to checking for missing values, bad data types and the like for data conversion purposes. |
  |
Ability to support multiple network protocols including TCP/IP, SPX/IPX, Banyan Vines, ISO/OSI, and Asynchronous X.25. |
  |
Has a software quality management system been used in the development of the application? |
  |
Reports may be directed by the end-user to any printer attached to the network. |
  |
Reports may be submitted with the specification of a time at which the print job should be run. |
  |
Ability for the applications to take advantage of symmetric multi-processors by letting the operating system decide which processor to execute on. |
  |
Ability to extend the scalability of the database across multiple nodes of a clustered or MPP machine, thereby reducing the workload on any one machine. |
  |
What was the original database used when the application was first developed? |
  |
What were the original development tools used when the application was first developed? |
  |
Provide a breakdown of all programming languages used by percentage, and include the release level of the development tools. Provide this information in Section 3.0. |
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
State total number of Court System Customers. |
  |
State total number of Court System Customers on the proposed client/server version product. |
  |
State total number of Civil Court Customers. |
  |
State total number of Criminal Court Customers. |
  |
State total number of Traffic Court Customers. |
  |
State total number of Juvenile Court Customers. |
  |
Ability for user definition and maintenance of system values and rules without requiring programmer intervention or recompilation of programs. |
  |
Ability to establish unlimited user-defined events for case activities. |
  |
Ability to generate docket entries, events and document production based on specified docket entries and/or case events. |
  |
Ability to associate docket entries and designate a cause/effect relationship. |
  |
Ability to employ "if, then" and "if, then, unless" conditional statements in event generation. |
  |
Ability to define the number of days between trigger entries and automatically generated docket entries, events and document production. |
  |
Ability to review automatically generated events and documents, and approve or override those system generated items. |
  |
Ability to generate court defined, variable minutes on demand through the use of a word processing package integrated with the court case management application. |
  |
Ability for the software's use with an independent query/report language which will provide inquiry and report generation capabilities. |
  |
Ability to link screens in a user-defined, logical progression without requiring programmer intervention or recompilation of programs. |
  |
Ability to exit pre-defined linked screens at any point during the process. |
  |
Ability to provide a security component which controls access to information based on organization and individual permissions. |
  |
Ability to tailor individual security profiles, based on user id, court, location, and case types. |
  |
Security permissions control access to individual screens and programs, sealed cases, parties, and addresses of parties |
  |
Ability to provide software written using a fourth generation language. |
  |
Ability to produce both standard and ad hoc reports, as well as allow for the use of standard query tools and statistical packages. |
  |
Ability to produce standard letters and documents and include specific database information. |
  |
Ability to make available any database elements for inclusion in system generated letters and forms. |
  |
Ability to query data using phonetic and wildcard search criteria. |
  |
Ability to specify case types, and assign a case weight and security level to each case type. |
  |
System employs a flexible case numbering scheme which gives the court options to include the year number, sequence number and court location in a user-defined position sequence. |
  |
Ability to define standard docket entries and standard docket text. |
  |
Ability to associate standard docket entries to fees. |
  |
System provides option to assign cases to judges automatically, using either weighted or random judge assignment, or to assign cases to judges manually. |
  |
Provide option for system wide date and time defaults. |
  |
Ability to automatically generate docket entries through case initiation process. Docket entries must variable by case type. |
  |
Ability to override docket entries automatically defaulted in case initiation process. |
  |
Ability to charge fees automatically as cases are initiated, or as subsequent docket entries are made. |
  |
Ability to charge fees to a specific party. |
  |
Ability to charge fees at the general case level - not associated to a particular party. |
  |
Ability to access fines, bonds, receipts, payable records, payments issued, outstanding receivable accounts and costs for a person or a case.. |
  |
Ability to copy information from one case to another including parties and docket entries. |
  |
Ability to relate cases and designate a lead case in a set of related cases. |
  |
Ability to cross-reference a case number by with unlimited user defined agency case numbers, and ability to search by the cross-reference number. |
  |
Ability to consolidate cases, parties, dockets and accounts. |
  |
Ability to review a summarized status of a case including, at a minimum, case number, description, case type, court, location, filing date, judge, current status, last activity, related and consolidated cases, age of case, parties, judgments, judgment amounts, dispositions and sentences |
  |
Ability to list all cases with options to sort by court type, location, case type, case status, and final dispositions only. |
  |
Ability to order the display of cases by filing date, court location, case number or court type. |
  |
Ability to list cases for specific attorneys or parties. |
  |
Ability to access all case, accounting, arrest, pending service, personal, judgment and sentencing information for a person from one screen. |
  |
Ability to maintain extensive confidential notes. |
  |
Ability to track the number and types of cases assigned to each judge. |
  |
Ability to track court process of service on-line. |
  |
Ability to issue service documents to specific parties and track the due dates and outcome of service. |
  |
Ability to designate ID of person to whom the service document is assigned. |
  |
Ability to define data available for public access. |
  |
Ability to define data available for attorney access. |
  |
Ability to track multiple legal issues per case. |
  |
Ability to enter and maintain judgment information including parties for and against, and amounts. |
  |
Ability to query judgment indexes. |
  |
Ability to create standard reports including:
|
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
Ability to schedule events and cases for judges, commissioners, masters, hearing officers, or any other court-defined judicial officers. |
  |
Ability to define standard working hours and designate non-working days, such as weekends and holidays, for the entire court and default that information for all judicial officers and court personnel. |
  |
Ability to define specific working hours by day for each judge, judicial officer or court official. |
  |
Ability to vary the elements of a judicial calendar including days, start and end times, location, and room, and to include an effective date for each entry in the judicial officer's profile. |
  |
Ability to indicate days when individuals with calendar profiles (judges, hearing officers, etc.) are unavailable for scheduling. |
  |
Ability to designate a case as ready for scheduling. |
  |
Ability to schedule cases for a date and room without assigning to a particular judge at the time of scheduling. |
  |
Ability to have system automatically generate docket entry when an event is scheduled. |
  |
Ability to schedule related and/or consolidated cases at the time a case is scheduled. |
  |
Ability, at the time of scheduling to have system check time conflicts for the room, judge, parties, and attorneys. |
  |
Ability to resolve or override scheduling conflicts. |
  |
Ability to add parties to scheduled events. |
  |
Ability, when scheduling a case or event, to have the system present the next available date and time for a single judge or multiple judges. |
  |
Ability to view a summarized calendar showing previously assigned events and total hours used. |
  |
Ability to print calendars in both summary and detailed formats. |
  |
Ability to list a schedule of events by, but not limited to, judge, date, room, location, and event type. |
  |
Ability to display all events within a case, or to sort the event display by status. |
  |
Ability to block out time for specific court personnel, including non-case related time. |
  |
Ability to generate tickler event records based on user-defined prerequisite criteria. |
  |
Ability to define a required sequence of events, such that an event cannot be scheduled unless a precursor event or events have occurred. |
  |
Ability to automatically generate notices and letters as an event is scheduled or rescheduled. |
  |
Ability to enter unlimited comments about an event. |
  |
Ability to schedule an unlimited number of events per day or to define a specific number of events scheduled per day. |
  |
Ability to automatically schedule events based on the occurrence or non-occurrence of other events or docket entries, with an options to override the actual scheduling or change the dates of those automatically generated events. |
  |
Ability to track event status and record event outcomes. |
  |
Ability to record all persons in attendance at a scheduled event, including court personnel. |
  |
Ability to associate parties and non-parties to specific events. |
  |
Ability to print calendars and/or view on-line. |
  |
Ability to assign extra cases to a calendar and designate those cases as "add-on's". |
  |
Ability to create calendars by judge, room, event, date, and time, or any combination of these. |
  |
Ability to accommodate master, individual, or hybrid scheduling processes. |
  |
Ability to reschedule one or many items at any time. |
  |
Ability to reschedule blocks of events from one judge to another. |
  |
Ability to execute mass rescheduling using individual or combined criteria of judge, room, date, time, event, location and/or calendar. |
  |
Ability to query future events and activities. |
  |
Ability to link disposing docket entries with events choose whether to close or delete open and/or future scheduled events. |
  |
Ability to support scheduling for multiple courts and locations. |
  |
Ability to track continuances (adjournments) by event. |
  |
Ability to report continuance rates by event. |
  |
Ability to have system consider case complexity in scheduling. |
  |
| Ability to display on-line number and types of cases assigned per judge. |   |
Ability to create standard reports including:
|
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
Ability to maintain one full current name for a person with virtually unlimited alternate names. |
  |
Ability to establish an unlimited number of user defined party types, including non-litigant parties. |
  |
Ability to associate parties and define the relationship between associated parties. |
  |
Ability to group certain party types (e.g., judges, court personnel, etc.) into a restricted category with separate security permissions required to access information about any persons in that category. |
  |
Ability to maintain multiple addresses and address types for a person with an effective date for each address. |
  |
Ability to track the source reason for address information, activity date of change, and identification of person making the change. |
  |
Ability to classify an address as confidential, and prohibit access to that address by anyone without the required security profile. |
  |
Ability to maintain multiple phone numbers for a person, some of them not associated with an address. |
  |
Ability to review all cases in which a person is involved. |
  |
Ability to access a person by name and/or ID. |
  |
Ability to capture personal information:
|
  |
Ability to maintain extensive vehicle data:
|
  |
Ability to maintain a wide variety of professional information:
|
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
Ability to track bond amounts, bond defaults, bond refunds and surety information. |
  |
Ability to sentence multiple cases/violations on one screen. |
  |
Ability to make bond adjustments. |
  |
Ability to track changes made to bond amounts. |
  |
Ability to print bond receipts. |
  |
Ability to process felony, misdemeanor and traffic cases. |
  |
Ability to track moving or non-moving violations. |
  |
Ability to default case title/style information for traffic cases. |
  |
Ability to define which data elements will be included on traffic case processing screen and the order in which those elements will be displayed. |
  |
Ability to enter unlimited detail about docket entries, offenses, probable cause, pleas, sentences and release information. |
  |
Ability to associate fines with offenses and automatically charge default fines amounts based on charges filed for offenses. |
  |
Ability to associate fines with offenses and automatically default fine amounts based on charges sentenced. |
  |
Ability to enter parking tickets grouped by issuing officer and date. |
  |
Ability to enter probable cause information and tie it to the violation record. |
  |
Ability to enter free form text on violation record. |
  |
Ability to enter enhancements to a violation. |
  |
Ability to format violation entry screen to correspond with the order of information as it appears on the ticket. |
  |
Ability to enter vehicle information and later tie it to owner. |
  |
Ability to copy charges from one case to another (or multiple cases). |
  |
Ability to enter multiple violations on a case. |
  |
Ability to sort data by criminal or traffic violation. |
  |
Ability to associate sentences with parties. |
  |
Ability to enter concurrent or consecutive sentences. |
  |
Ability to update sentence information. |
  |
Ability to search sentencing information by variable criteria including defendant, case ID or violation (charge). |
  |
Ability to enter multiple sentences for an offense. |
  |
Ability to enter and modify charge data. |
  |
Ability to enter and modify pleas associated with charges. |
  |
Ability to delete charges on-line. |
  |
Ability to enter multiple sentences for charges. |
  |
Ability to quickly enter dispositions to traffic cases. |
  |
Ability to enter dispositions for enhancements. |
  |
Ability to associate docket codes with sentences. |
  |
Ability to enter concurrent or consecutive sentences. |
  |
Ability to add free form text to sentence records. |
  |
Ability to sentence multiple cases/violations on one screen. |
  |
Ability to create accounts receivable records automatically for sentences imposed. |
  |
Ability to monitor release status of persons at case level or specific to individual charge. |
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
Ability to assign one master number for the minor with each subsequent contact or filing having a suffix, thereby providing separate tracking for each. |
  |
Ability to attach dockets, violations, events and dispositions to each contact with the court. |
  |
Ability to view the master case together with sub-cases attached to the master case. |
  |
Ability for the court to designate which terms the system will use for violations and arrests or detentions, and to use the court designated wording on system screens. |
  |
Ability to display ID of user who last modified data. |
  |
Ability to record the violation on which a minor was released. |
  |
Ability to maintain cases as "sealed" and to strictly control access to the case. |
  |
Ability to hide from unauthorized users even the existence of a sealed case. |
  |
Ability to establish relationships between parties, including family relationships, client relationships, agency relationships, or another other relationships designated by the court. |
  |
Ability to establish rules for automatically assigning juveniles to a particular department or judge based any of the following criteria, with an option to designate the priority of those criteria:
|
  |
Ability to define default party type code for minor and co-defendant. |
  |
Ability to use co-defendant, family, or other court-defined relationships in scheduling functions. |
  |
Ability to specify minimum age for party receiving documents created. |
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
Ability to assess any number or combination of case related or miscellaneous, non-case related fees, fines, or costs associated. |
  |
Ability to produce a balance report on demand for case(s) and/or person(s) on-line or printed. |
  |
Ability to track accounts receivable data for case related and non-case related items. |
  |
Ability to maintain the court-defined set of rules for applying payments and distributing to various accounts according to selected options in hierarchy and pro-rating methods. |
  |
Ability to record payments against an account and apply those payments to charges using the court-defined set of rules and priorities, real-time. |
  |
Provision for manual distribution of payments across multiple cases and fees. |
  |
Ability to establish payment plans and time payments, specifying payment frequency and recipients, and tying plans to accounts receivable. |
  |
Ability to have cashiering sessions open for multiple cashiers. |
  |
|
REQUIREMENTS |
Response |
| Document imaging is an integral part of the proposed system. It must support a large database of stored images that are seamlessly accessed via API's from the application software. Intuitive ease of operation is of major importance. The document imaging system proposed must provide the software to handle all operations related to the scanning and retrieval of documents that are received for recording by this office. Specifically, the Document Imaging application must provide for the following items. | |
General Requirements |
|
| The system must be PC based and support stand-alone and network versions. |   |
| The system must utilize Windows or Windows NT operating system on the client workstations and Windows NT or UNIX on the database or mass storage servers. |   |
| Systems must be LAN independent. |   |
The systems must support the ability to create both turnkey applications and enabled applications.
|
  |
| The system, whether turnkey or enabled, must support the ODBC database standard. The system must be able to supply any of the ODBC database drivers available. |   |
The system, whether turnkey or enabled, must support the following levels or security:
|
  |
The system must support multiple objects including:
|
  |
The system must provide desktop utilities that can enhance and process images including:
|
  |
| The system objects must be compressed and decompressed through software and, if desired, a hardware option may be obtained. |   |
| System must support the display of any object on a VGA screen or better. |   |
| Provision for a relational database management system. |   |
| System objects must be able to be stored and retrieved as standard files from a variety of magnetic, DAT, and CD-ROM subsystems. |   |
| The system storage back-end must support standard file system interfaces allowing any PC desktop application to "see" the back-end as a logical drive and utilize its storage potential. |   |
| The system must support the ability to migrate on ODBC database application from one ODBC database to another. |   |
| The system back-end must support SCSI, optical WORM, M/O drives, and jukeboxes, DAT drives and jukeboxes, and CD-ROM drives and jukeboxes. |   |
| The system back-end must support a simple, standard Windows interface. Proprietary user interfaces will not be accepted. Windows must be running at all times and be native to anything (feature and/or process) the application is doing. |   |
| The system back-end must support a variety of hardware subsystems from many different vendors. In addition, the back-end must support sophisticated caching capabilities, backup and archive features, reports, platter management, and move scheduling through a standard GUI. |   |
| The Windows interface must support the ability to create and/or add objects through a scanner, file importation facility, fax queue, clipboard, or OLE application. |   |
| Minimally, the system must support bi-tonal, grayscale, color and engineering drawing size scanners. |   |
| The system must support the ability to print and fax any object (bi-tonal, grayscale, and color) on existing Windows print or fax devices. Color images are expected to be converted to and acceptable (e.g. bi-tonal) format to output device "on-the-fly". The system must not force the user to run any other program to convert them. |   |
| The system must support the ability to organize objects in a user defined environment. |   |
| The system must be able to publish applications including the database, viewer, and objects to CD-R for self contained CD retrieval, viewing, printing, and faxing. |   |
| The system must directly support a variety of OCR and workflow packages. |   |
| The system must be OLE 1 and 2 compliant. IN OLE w, the system must support Container and Automation standards as well as drag and drop. |   |
The system must support computer output files (COLD) and have the following capabilities:
|
  |
| Provision for multiple databases to allow for testing, training, etc., that co-reside and may be accessed simultaneously with productive use of production database. |   |
| Provision for seamless integration of all proposed systems. |   |
| Provision for version change control to maintain update modification information for support purposes. |   |
| Ability to support visual image annotation. |   |
| Ability to receive images from industry standard microfilm sources for concurrent update of image index and document image databases. |   |
| Ability to support from one hundred thousand to 5+ million of multi-page on-line documents. |   |
| Ability to provide full document image and image index database integrity and backup provisions. |   |
| Ability to provide disaster recovery procedures of the image index and document image database. |   |
| Ability to provide seamless (to the end-user) client based API integration with form generation software, via Microsoft Windows DDE, or via a Visual Basic client application. |   |
| Ability to perform basic server imaging functions via a server API for retrieval, queuing, faxing, etc. |   |
|
System Hardware and Software Support |
|
| Ability to execute in a Microsoft Windows client workstation session, concurrent with form generation software. |   |
| Ability to manage multiple view and scan, graphical user interface sessions. |   |
| Ability to present - via API requests - images on a Microsoft Windows compatible split-screen display, with the image session and the imaging requesting application session both able to be viewed simultaneously in full screen mode. |   |
| Ability to provide API controlled image printing on multiple Microsoft Windows supported laser printers, without the use of imaging boards. |   |
| Ability to provide a means of storing images in an industry standard format. |   |
| Ability to support multiple standard SCSI optical drives and jukeboxes. |   |
| Ability to provide software-level image compression and decompression workstation support, that requires no additional imaging boards. |   |
| Ability to support TCP/IP network protocol. |   |
|
Fax Support |
|
| Ability to provide API controlled faxing of images to remote locations along with flexible fax retry options and API feedback, on both the server and the client. |   |
| Ability to queue multiple concurrent fax requests. |   |
|
Scanning of Documents |
|
| Ability to scan documents using multiple scan stations. |   |
| Ability to scan documents at resolutions of 100-400 DPI in half tone, gray scale modes. |   |
| Ability to provide document verification during the individual and batch scanning process. |   |
| Ability to accept input from remote scanners and FAX machines. |   |
| Ability to scan, index, and commit documents in batches as well as individually. |   |
| Ability to automatically index utilizing an industry standard, non-proprietary, zone bar-code on either the first or the last page of the document; with optional inclusion of the bar-code page as a part of the image. |   |
| Ability to allow manual alteration of the image index to correct operation errors. |   |
| Ability to re-scan a complete document or part of a document without having to manually delete all pages of the mis-scanned document, then having to re-scan the complete document. |   |
|
Viewing of Documents |
|
| Ability to provide an efficient means of document retrieval and rapid page to page transition. |   |
| Ability to provide full function and user friendly image manipulation without a requiring a mouse. |   |
| Ability to allow the scanned document to be rotated, moved on the screen, scrolled page by page, displayed in reverse video, and to provide the terminal user with the ability to enlarge a section of the scanned document. |   |
| Ability to isolate designated public use terminals and users from accessing image system functions other than those specifically required to view and manipulate (i.e. page forward and backward, rotate, reverse image, and magnify) an image. |   |
| Ability to handle multiple, simultaneous requests for an imaging document, and for multiple imaging documents. |   |
| Ability to scroll through a displayed image that is too large to fit on the workstation monitor. |   |
| Ability to provide security control over access to document images, scanning, print and fax operations, and over index database information. |   |
| 1) |
Five years of Audited Financial Information |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 2) |
Current Year Dun & Bradstreet Report |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 3) |
Company Organization Chart |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 4) |
Company EEO Report |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 5) |
Help Desk Response & Resolution Statistics |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 6) |
Customer Satisfaction Survey Form(s) |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 7) |
Customer Satisfaction Survey Results |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 8) |
Source Code Agreement (Not Escrow) |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 9) |
Object Code Agreement |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 10) |
Support Agreement |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 11) |
Programming Languages Used |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 12) |
Account Manager's Description |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 13) |
Project Manager's Description |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 14) |
Product Manager's Resume |
Included (Y/N) _________ |
| 15) |
Proposed Software Users' Manuals |
Included (Y/N) _________ |